« hidey ho, everybody | Main | spring has sprung »

2008.03.01

lava lamp dilemma

Lavalamp When Michael left his job back at the other end of February he brought home a second lava lamp for us. Since I was a kid I've always loved a lava lamp. Principles of thermal fluid dynamics playing out in an infinite array of organic forms can mesmerize me for hours.

Here's the problem I'm having, lava lamps require incandescent bulbs to work. Ironically, to do their thing, they consume the wasted energy (heat) that makes incandescents so inefficient in the first place.

Here's my quandry; with the big eco push to compact florescence and LED's is it ok to run a bunch of incandescent bulbs stricy for my viewing pleasure? Especially given the fact that it takes about an hour to really getting to it's most visually performative state.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452688869e200e550a34afa8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference lava lamp dilemma:

Comments

If you promise to change all your other lights to eco-efficient models you may have a lava lamp as an art object. Art is not supposed to be efficient.

An interesting question would be whether lava lamps are banned under the new legislation that requires improved light bulb efficiency beginning in 2009.

But, either way, I think the answer is that you should definitely have and use your lava lamp if you want it. If you are concerned about environmental impact, there are a number of other ways you can reduce your carbon footprint to offset the lamp. Certainly, changing out the other light bulbs in the house that you *don't* need the heat from is a good start :-)

My wife and I burn a fire in our fireplace many nights in the winter. Since we have a traditional fireplace, it actually wastes more heat than it produces (because the air going up the chimney is replaced by cold air coming through cracks). We really enjoy the fireplace, and are willing to pay a little extra to the electric company to compensate.

Actually in the winter time incandecent light bulbs are 100% efficient as the excess heat is used to suplement heating requirements. The CFL legislation is junk science at its worst.

I'm with Brian Lee on this one.
In the winter time incandescent (and other heat producing item) help to heat your apartment (which might i add is pretty cold).
CFLs are a scam to make people buy more crap.

But doesn't this make the incandescent blub really bad in the warmer months? and we know there is a partial ban on air conditioning in your apartment...

I love your blog so much, and there are just some differences with others'. Hope there will be more wonderful things in your blog. Happy every day! http://www.star-trek-dvd.com/star_trek/The_Next_Generation/index.html

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment